|
|||
Special guest writer Sean "Casey" Casey makes his case for Counter Strike Source, compares it with previous versions of Counter Strike and looks into its future.
The Case for Source by Casey As the dust has settled, it has become somewhat of a consensus that Source has been rejected by much of the CS community, just as Condition-Zero was before it. While some are happy to finally be given a new chapter, for better or for worse, to a game well over 5 years old, others deem the new game as simply “not good enough” to replace the old CS. The future of Source is now up for debate, and much in the competitive gaming community is at stake either way. Thus, this presents several questions: What exactly is wrong with Source; what is right? Why has Source failed thus far to become the community’s game of choice? Who’s stopping Source? Why make the change? What does it take to make Source succeed? While there are not clear answers to any of these questions, the community does itself a great disservice by not attempting to answer them. Thus, we shall examine some of the causes and possible solutions to the community’s issues with Source. |





User Comments
- 320 Comments» This story has had 320 comments posted since September 12, 2005 at 9:38 PM EDT.